Are EMU Debtors Getting the Upper Hand Over Creditors?

Please note that we are not authorised to provide any investment advice. The content on this page is for information purposes only.


The key axis in Europe is between creditors and debtors.  Each pushes their own interests.  The regime of austerity in Europe indicates that the creditors have had the upper hand.  However, two developments in the last two days suggest the tide is turning. 


The key axis in Europe is between creditors and debtors.  Each pushes their own interests.  The regime of austerity in Europe indicates that the creditors have had the upper hand.  However, two developments in the last two days suggest the tide is turning. 

After a challenge in German court, today’s preliminary, non-binding opinion by Advocate General of the European Court of Justice rules in favor of the Outright Market Transaction facility.  The key element of the opinion was that the ECB should have extensive leeway in conducting monetary policy.  There should not be a pre-determined cap on its purchases.  It can buy bonds with lower credit ratings.  The ECB does not necessarily need to be a “preferred creditor” in case of debt restructuring; thus endorsing the financial principle of pari passu. 

The clear implication is that a sovereign bond purchase program, which the ECB expects to launch at one of its next two meetings, does not violate the controlling treaties.  ECB President Draghi could have hardly hoped for a more favorable opinion.  It is true that the final decision in 4-5 months may be different from the Advocate General’s opinion, but this is not often the case.  The German Constitutional Court, that first heard the case, could also decide differently.  However, as it referred the case to the European Court of Justice, it would seem to have to respect what it says about the ECB.  The German court may add some requirements for the role of the German parliament.

Monetary union is still a relatively new development.  The institutional relationships are still developing.  The US had a similar experience after its founding.  It was not clear about the relative power of the judicial branch or its authority to review the constitutionality of legislative or executive actions.  It took several years to work this out (see Marbury vs. Madison), and even then, it had challenges.  Much of the New Deal was unconstitutional, and Franklin Roosevelt tried to dilute the Supreme Court’s hostility by expanding its size.  He was defeated in this attempt. 

The bottom line is that the preliminary opinion supports the ECB’s authority to determine the appropriate monetary policy and tools necessary to implement it.  The principles would seem to recognize its right to buy sovereign bonds.   A sovereign bond purchase program appears to draw the most support from the debtors, not creditors, in the EMU.  That said, the German government did not seem as opposed to OMT as was the Bundesbank.  BBK President Weidmann presented before the German Constitutional Court, objecting to the OMT. 

The other development this week that supports the debtors is more subtle than a court decision. It was a bureaucratic adjustment requiring neither member government approval nor support from the European parliament.  It was the European Commission updating its budget enforcement rules.  

The thrust of the change is to grant more fiscal flexibility to countries that make greater efforts in structural reforms.  While it retains the principle of equal treatment, the EC wants to allow some countries greater flexibility.  For example, it is willing to accept investment initiatives if a country can show its growth is significantly below potential.  Countries can earn “credit” or goodwill for enacting structural reforms or pursue smaller fiscal adjustments in time of economic weakness.  

France and Italy have until March to convince that European Commission of the credibility of its 2015 budgets.  The new flexibility announced yesterday would seem to offer these two countries in particular a carrot.  Germany was quick to push back.  The budget spokesperson for the CDU in parliament cautioned against diluting the commitment to fiscal reform and consolidation.  Spokesperson (Berthle) quoted on the news wires saying, “Instead of thinking again about more flexible application, all member states should focus on getting their budgets under control sustainably.”  

The interests of the creditors and debtors in EMU need to be balanced to ensure a return to a sustainable grow path.  The balance of power shifted in recent years to the interest of the creditors.  Although it is commonplace to see references to Greece’s bailout or another peripheral country’s bailout in the various aid programs.  However, this is a misrepresentation of what happened.  More often than not, it was the creditors, including official creditors, who received a bailout.  The economic activity, the levels of unemployment and the other social costs suggest that the debtors where not bailed out, and in fact are in more debt now than prior to the crisis.  Leaving aside some private sector creditors in Greece, the creditors have not failed to receive a single interest payment.   

In the tug-of-war between creditors and debtors, the flag is still favoring creditors.  The two developments discussed here, the ECJ preliminary decision and the more formal fiscal flexibility suggested by yesterday EC announcement, move the flag a little bit.  The adjustment process, including a weaker euro, will continue.  Over time, the decline in the euro, interest rates, and commodity prices, especially oil, will have the EMU find a stronger growth path.

Shifting Power between Creditors and Debtors in EMU is republished with permission from Marc to Market

About Marc Chandler PRO INVESTOR

Head of Global Currency Strategy at Brown Brothers Harriman.