Darker Side of For-Profit Indian Micro-Credit

Please note that we are not authorised to provide any investment advice. The content on this page is for information purposes only.


11 January 2011.

At the end of last year, we ran a Feature on how Vinod Khosla, co-founder of Sun Microsystems, now a division of Oracle, 


11 January 2011.

At the end of last year, we ran a Feature on how Vinod Khosla, co-founder of Sun Microsystems, now a division of Oracle, 

had taken a leading position in the for-profit Indian micro-credit sector, one he espoused for reasons of both principle and profit.

While many of our readers applauded what we characterized as his effort to “do well by doing good,”

others felt we were too willing to accept the assertions by Khosla and other big players in the field

that micro-credit was an unvarnished good, both in general and in India in particular.

Since we DO pay attention to our readers, we thought we’d take a further look at the micro-credit scene,

first in India today, and, in future, more broadly throughout the world.

While we remain optimistic about the potential for micro-credit in alleviating intense poverty in India and elsewhere,

there is no doubt a dark side to the micro-credit scene, which we feel important to present for the sake of offering a comprehensive picture.

Indeed, India’s rapidly growing private microcredit industry faces a major challenge,

as almost all borrowers in Andhra Pradesh, one of the country’s largest states, have stopped repaying their loans,

supported by politicians who accuse the industry of earning outsize profits on the backs of the poor.

Indian banks, which put up about 80 percent of the money that the companies lent to poor consumers,

are increasingly worried that, after surviving the global financial crisis mostly unscathed, they could now face serious losses.

They have about $4 billion tied up in the industry, banking officials say.

“We are extremely worried about our exposure to the microfinance sector,”

said Sunand K. Mitra, a senior executive at Axis Bank, speaking last year on a panel at the India Economic Summit.

The region’s crisis is likely to reverberate around the globe.

Initially the work of nonprofit groups, the tiny loans to the poor known as microcredit once seemed a promising path out of poverty for millions.

In recent years, foundations, venture capitalists and the World Bank have used India as a petri dish

for similar for-profit “social enterprises” that seek to make money while filling a social need.

Like-minded industries have sprung up in Africa, Latin America and other parts of Asia.

But microfinance in pursuit of profits has led some microcredit companies around the world

to extend loans to poor villagers at exorbitant interest rates and without enough regard for their ability to repay.

In so doing, some companies have more than doubled their revenues annually.

Responding to public anger over abuses in the microcredit industry — and growing reports of suicides among people unable to pay mounting debts —

legislators in Andhra Pradesh last year passed a stringent new law restricting how the companies can lend and collect money.

Even as the new legislation was being passed, local leaders urged people to renege on their loans,

and repayments on nearly $2 billion in loans in the state have virtually ceased.

If the trend continues, the industry faces collapse in a state where more than a third of its borrowers live.

Lenders are also having trouble making new loans in other states,

because banks have slowed lending to them as fears about defaults have grown.

Government officials in the state say they had little choice but to act,

and point to women like Durgamma Dappu, a widowed laborer from this impoverished village

who took a loan from a private microfinance company because she wanted to build a house.

She had never had a bank account or earned a regular salary but was given a $200 loan anyway, which she struggled to repay.

So she took another from a different company, then another, until she was nearly $2,000 in debt.

In September she fled her village, leaving her family little choice but to forfeit her tiny plot of land, and her dreams.

“These institutions are using quite coercive methods to collect,”

said V. Vasant Kumar, the state’s minister for rural development.

“They aren’t looking at sustainability or ensuring the money is going to income-generating activities.

They are just making money.”

Reddy Subrahmanyam, a senior official who helped write the Andhra Pradesh legislation,

accuses microfinance companies of making “hyperprofits off the poor,” and said

the industry had become no better than the widely despised village loan sharks it was intended to replace.

“The money lender lives in the community,” he said.

“At least you can burn down his house. With these companies, it is loot and scoot.”

Indeed, some of the anger appears to have been fueled by the recent initial public offering of shares by SKS Microfinance, India’s largest for-profit microlender,

backed by famous investors like Khosla, whose efforts we profiled, and George Soros.        

SKS and its shareholders raised more than $350 million on the stock market in August.

Its revenue and profits have grown around 100 percent annually in recent years.

This year, Vikram Akula, chairman of SKS Microfinance, privately sold shares worth about $13 million.

He defended the industry’s record before the India Economic Summit meeting last November,

saying that a few rogue operators may have given improper loans, but that the industry was too important to fail.

“Microfinance has made a tremendous contribution to inclusive growth,” he said.

Destroying microfinance, he said, would result in “nothing less than financial apartheid.”
   
Indian microfinance companies have some of the world’s lowest interest rates for small loans.

Akula said that his company had reduced its interest rate by six percentage points, to 24 percent [!!!]

in the past several years, as volume had brought down expenses.

Unlike other officials in his industry, Vijay Mahajan, the chairman of Basix, an organization that provides loans and other services to the poor,

acknowledged that many lenders grew too fast and lent too aggressively.

Investments by private equity firms and the prospect of a stock market listing drove firms to increase lending as fast as they could, he said.        

“In their quest to grow,” he said, “they kept piling on more loans in the same geographies.”

He added, “That led to more indebtedness, and in some cases it led to suicides.”

Still, he said, the number of borrowers who are struggling to pay off their debts is much smaller than officials have asserted.

He estimates that 20 percent have borrowed more than they can afford, and that just 1 percent are in serious trouble.

One of India’s leading social workers, Ela Bhatt, who heads the Self-Employed Women’s Association, or SEWA, said

microfinance firms had lost sight of the fact that

the poor needed more than loans to be successful entrepreneurs.

They need business and financial advice as well, she said.

“They were more concerned about growth —

not growth of the livelihoods and economic status of the clients, but only the institutions’ growth,” she said.

Mr. Mahajan, who is also the chairman of the Microfinance Institutions Network, said that

the industry was now planning to create a fund to help restructure the loans of the 20 percent of borrowers in Andhra Pradesh who were struggling.

He also said the industry, which has been reluctant to accept outside help,

would share its client databases with the government,

and was negotiating restrictions on retail lending that did not go through the nonprofit self-help lending groups.

The collapse of the industry could have severe consequences for borrowers,

who may be forced to resort to money lenders once again.

But it is tough to find a household in impoverished areas of Andhra Pradesh that is not deeply in debt to a for-profit microfinance company.

K. Shivamma, a 38-year-old farmer, said she took her first loan hoping to reverse several years of crop failure brought on by drought.

“When you take the loan they say, ‘Don’t worry, it is easy to pay back,’ ” Ms. Shivamma said.        

The man from Share, the company that made her first loan, did not ask about her income, Ms. Shivamma said.

She soon ran into trouble paying back the $400 loan, and took out another loan, and then another.

Now she owes nearly $2,000 and has no idea how she will repay it.

The television, the mobile phone and the two buffaloes she bought with one loan were sold long ago.

“I know it is a vicious circle,” she said. “But there is no choice but to go on,” she told a reporter from the New York Times.

Insofar as her case is indicative of any significant portion of the population,

this darker side of micro-credit is not just a human tragedy,

but can also serve as a brake on India’s domestically-oriented exponential economic growth.

If 20 percent of the population in a state like Andhra Pradesh is indeed unable to meet its debt obligations,

then a solution to this micro-credit problem is imperative from not just a human / social justice, but also economic growth, point of view.

At least so far, such a mutually beneficial outcome seems far from certain,

which would be a tragedy, for not just the individuals and families involved, but the entire nation of India.

David Caploe PhD

Editor-in-Chief

EconomyWatch.com

President / acalaha.com

About Liz Zuliani PRO INVESTOR

Diverse background in digital media, with experience working across large networks, to boutique sites and start-up ventures.