Crypto Twitter Connects Sam Bankman-Fried to the BALD Liquidity Rug Pull
Please note that we are not authorised to provide any investment advice. The content on this page is for information purposes only.
A new conspiracy is making rounds on crypto Twitter, suggesting that Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced founder of FTX, is covertly controlling a new meme coin called BALD on Base.
Blockchain enthusiasts closely monitoring the situation suspect that Bankman-Fried might have initially withdrawn liquidity from the BALD meme coin, only to reintroduce it later.
Blockchain Watchers Connect the Dots
The latest buzz on crypto Twitter is a compelling and controversial theory suggesting that Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) is secretly behind developing a new cryptocurrency called BALD.
The BALD meme coin, named humorously after Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, was launched on July 30th, 2023, and saw an astounding 289,000% surge in value within the first 24 hours of trading.
These 4 addresses spent 0.534 $ETH($1K) to buy 50M $BALD (50% of the total supply) within 4 mins of $BALD starting trading.
Then sold 37M $BALD for 554 $ETH($1.04M).
Earned $1M with $1K in 1 day! pic.twitter.com/gXIDRjbhic
— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) July 30, 2023
However, on July 31st, 2023, things took a sharp turn when the anonymous developer removed a substantial amount of ETH liquidity, causing the price of BALD to plummet by more than 85%.
$BALD deployer just removed 1034 ETH from Liquidity 😳😳😳
Others removed 6,800 eth and 1800 ETH from liq as well 😳😳😳https://t.co/A2357QUF0H pic.twitter.com/4lH8LHxv2v
— notEezzy 🧸 (@notEezzy) July 31, 2023
In the aftermath, investors accused the developer of executing a rug pull, but the developer vehemently denied these allegations.
Taking to social media, they asserted that they had not sold any tokens since the coin’s launch. Instead, they clarified their actions as limited to adding/removing two-sided liquidity and purchasing.
I didn't sell a single token at any point since deployment. Just added/removed 2 sided liquidity and bought
— Bald (@BaldBaseBald) July 31, 2023
Subsequently, a coin collector countered the developer’s statement, asserting that adding two-sided liquidity amounts to selling tokens.
The BALD developer agreed with this viewpoint, responding, “You are correct.”
Amid these issues, blockchain investigators probed the developer’s on-chain activities, leading to a connection between SBF and the Ethereum address behind the BALD token launch.
Hsaka, an anonymous renowned trader, speculated that the BALD token’s launch and crash were deliberately timed to aid SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s efforts to prosecute Coinbase, FTX’s competitor.
>SBF spotted in NY
>One charge against him dropped few days later
>BALD launches couple days later
>Sucks in majority of onchain mindshare/liquidity
>BALD rugs
>Gary now has some ammo against Coinbase pic.twitter.com/nXLasTyG5P— Hsaka (@HsakaTrades) July 31, 2023
Others noticed similarities in the phrases used by the BALD Twitter account and those in Sam Bankman-Fried’s Twitter posts, such as “quite well” and “nor.”
Furthermore, another anonymous commentator named “Hype” pointed out several eerie resemblances between the developer and SBF, particularly in their sentence structures in social media posts.
– Bald deployer DYDX posts sound like SBF
– Onchain activity times line up with court dates/bail
– We know SBF was doing stuff through VPN recently(2/x) 👇
— hype (@hype_eth) July 31, 2023
Adding to the speculation, Blockworks data editor Andrew Thurman discovered that the same wallet address had made around 400 transfers to blacklisted USDT addresses and had connections with Alameda, which was considered significant.
Poking around the $BALD deployer's ETH address
Uses Binance deposit address 0x66634adea6ff8f4213d48e8fa5cdcef14b360b54
Another active wallet, 0x000f7f22bfc28d940d4b68e13213ab17cf107790 does too
That wallet has interacted with Andrew Keys and Alameda Research pic.twitter.com/7brwImMkCE
— Andrew T (@Blockanalia) July 31, 2023
As per a Reddit investigation, the BALD developer wallet allegedly received deposits from FTX and Alameda for over two years. It currently holds a balance of 12,331 ETH, equivalent to approximately $22 million at the time of this writing.
In a further twist to the tale, a Twitter user highlighted that an address regularly made deposits into the BALD deployer’s Binance wallet.
An address that frequently deposits into the Bald deployers Binance wallet, looks like it was one of the wallets that helped trigger the depeg of UST pic.twitter.com/nErM7gCa41
— Bran (@CryptoBran_) July 31, 2023
This address seems to be among the wallets responsible for triggering the disastrous depegging of Terra USD in May of the previous year.
The Conspiracy Meets Opposing Views
On the other side of the debate, skeptics dismissed the theory as mere speculation without concrete evidence.
They argued that it is improbable for SBF to be associated with such a scheme because he currently faces strict internet usage restrictions as part of his bail conditions.
Crypto influencer Tiffany Fong, who has had multiple conversations with SBF since his arrest, strongly criticized the conspiracy theory.
She explained that SBF has been using a non-internet flip phone since his bail conditions were updated in April.
Guys, SBF hasn't had access to a normal phone or laptop since April 2023 when his bail conditions changed. He's basically been using a flip phone without internet connection & a laptop with restricted access to whitelisted websites (e.g. NYT, WSJ, Courtlistener, etc).
Note: He…
— Tiffany Fong (@TiffanyFong_) July 31, 2023
In a subsequent post, she referred to crypto Twitter as “mentally ill.”
Supporting this theory, crypto investor Scott Melker tweeted, “I checked in for 5 minutes, and apparently, crypto Twitter believes that SBF rugged $BALD even though he has no internet access, computer, or phone and is under house arrest, at risk of a lengthy prison sentence.”
Checked in for 5 minutes and apparently crypto Twitter believes that SBF rugged $BALD even though he has no internet access, computer or phone and is under house arrest and at risk of going to jail forever.
This place is ridiculous.
— The Wolf Of All Streets (@scottmelker) July 31, 2023
On the other hand, while many on crypto Twitter are reluctant to directly accuse Sam Bankman-Fried, some believe the wallet likely belongs to someone close to him.
1/12
Alright, I've been sitting on this news all day, but let's look at the @BaldBaseBald deployer.
This is definitely someone from Alameda, but I don't think we can safely say that this is @SBF_FTX (even though he is a psycho)
Let's go👇 pic.twitter.com/qs7e2nMTI1
— Igor Igamberdiev (@FrankResearcher) August 1, 2023
Ultimately, only time will reveal the truth behind the BALD conspiracy theory. Until then, the crypto community will remain divided, with some steadfast in their beliefs and others calling for a more evidence-based approach.