Marketers try to maximize the popularity of their product, so that the brand co-exists with deeper, more empirical categories of objects. Kleenex is not only a type of tissue, but it has also become a generic name for all tissues. The same is true of Hoover with vacuum cleaners, sellotape and blu-tac with adhesives (in England) and so on. The brands become synonymous with their categories, which is both good and bad.
Modern examples of synonymous brands include Google (for search engines) and Twitter (for micro-blogging).
Metrics: Mind Share
The Question:
When thinking of my category, do prospects think of me?
Approach:
Percentage of my target audience who think of me top of mind
Commentary:
A brand marketer is doing well if there is strong mind share – and the job of a direct marketer is much easier. Ensure that you are measuring the right people – and find ways to correlate to revenue or market share.
The Formula:
Mind Share (%) = Respondents with Unaided Awareness/ Total Respondents
Metrics: Hierarchy of Effects (AAU)
Awareness (A)
How aware is the respondents of your brand (aided awareness)? What brand(s) come to respondents mind when asked about your category (unaided awareness)?
Awareness (%) = Respondents Citing Brand (%)/ Total Respondents (%)
Attitudes (A)
Do respondents think your brand is for them? Strengths & weaknesses?
Attitude (I) = Composite Rating by Respondents to a Series of Questions
Usage (U)
A measure of respondents self-reported behaviour
Usage (I) = Composite Rating of Respondents Self-Reported Behaviour
Methodology
A battery of questions on surveys or warranty cards, tracked over time.