The new US restrictions on aid to Pakistan was part of a $662 billion defence bill agreed by both House and Senate negotiators on Monday night, and is expected to be passed later this week.
Related: Afghanistan is Broke, US Drowning in Debt – So What About a War Ceiling?
Related: US Military Spending: For War or Peace?
According to Howard McKeon, the Republican chair of the House armed services committee, the US was seeking “assurances that Pakistan is countering improvised explosive devices in their country that are targeting our coalition forces,” and thus could not commit to providing more financial aid to the country.
The Pakistani government though have warned that the US’s move could cause relations between the two countries to descend to a record low, particularly after NATO air strikes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers in a friendly fire incident on two Pakistani border outposts on November 26.
“I don't see any good coming out of this,” he added.
Pakistan, who has described the airstrikes as a “deliberate attack”, responded to the deaths by temporarily sealing its Afghan borders to NATO trucks and tankers. A Pakistani parliamentary committee has also recommended imposing a tax on oil supplies to NATO just as one is imposed on every litre sold to Pakistanis.
“Pakistan will now impose tax on NATO supplies in light of the international conventions and practices, which will give the national exchequer billions of rupees of income,” said an official of the defence ministry, who chose to stay anonymous, in an interview with the Express Tribune.
On Sunday, Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani told the BBC that his country was likely to continue blocking its border to NATO convoys for several more weeks.
A former Pakistani general and security analyst added the US’s decision to freeze aid to the country could prompt the Pakistani government into hardening its stance against Washington.
Related: Pakistan Turns to China After US Suspends US$800 Million in Military Aid