And we found an item today - thank you Richard Martin ;-) - that only confirms our doubts about this "whatever" in particular, and President Obama in general.
Surprisingly enough, it came from Fox Business News - you'll be able to tell from all the self-congratulation below, seemingly justified in this case -
which we generally avoid for the same reason we avoid Fox News in general - nausea.
But if our nominee for head of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, Harvard Law professor Betsy Warren, is correctly quoted below,
then they do indeed deserve some kudos, especially since, as you'll see below, the stakes are VERY high.
So much for transparency.
Under a little-noticed provision of the recently passed financial-reform legislation,
the Securities and Exchange Commission no longer has to comply with virtually all requests for information releases from the public,
including those filed under the Freedom of Information Act.
The law, signed last week by President Obama, exempts the SEC from disclosing records or information derived from "surveillance, risk assessments, or other regulatory and oversight activities."
Given that the SEC is a regulatory body, the provision covers almost every action by the agency, lawyers say.
Congress and federal agencies can request information, but the public cannot.
That argument comes despite the President saying that one of the cornerstones of the sweeping new legislation was more transparent financial markets.
Indeed, in touting the new law, Obama specifically said it would “increase transparency in financial dealings."
The SEC cited the new law Tuesday in a FOIA action brought by FOX Business Network.
Steven Mintz, founding partner of law firm Mintz & Gold LLC in New York, lamented what he described as
“the backroom deal that was cut between Congress and the SEC to keep the SEC’s failures secret.
The only losers here are the American public.”
If the SEC’s interpretation stands, Mintz, who represents FOX Business Network, predicted
“the next time there is a Bernie Madoff failure the American public will not be able to obtain the SEC documents that describe the failure,”
referring to the shamed broker whose Ponzi scheme cost investors billions.
The SEC didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Criticism of the provision has been swift.
“It allows the SEC to block the public’s access to virtually all SEC records,”
said Gary Aguirre, a former SEC staff attorney-turned-whistleblower
who had accused the agency of thwarting an investigation into hedge fund Pequot Asset Management in 2005.
“It permits the SEC to promulgate its own rules and regulations regarding the disclosure of records
without getting the approval of the Office of Management and Budget, which typically applies to all federal agencies.”
Aguirre used FOIA requests in his own lawsuit against the SEC, which the SEC settled this year by paying him $755,000.
Aguirre, who was fired in September 2005, argued that supervisors at the SEC stymied an investigation of Pequot –
a charge that prompted an investigation by the Senate Judiciary and Finance committees.
The SEC closed the case in 2006, no doubt under the direct orders of George W Bush & his controller Dick Cheney,
but would re-open it three years later - once, that is, Cheney / Bush were finally out of office.
This year, Pequot and its founder, Arthur Samberg, were forced to pay $28 million to settle insider-trading charges related to shares of Microsoft.
The settlement with Aguirre came shortly later.
“From November 2008 through January 2009, I relied heavily on records obtained from the SEC through FOIA in communications to the FBI, Senate investigators, and the SEC
in arguing the SEC had botched its initial investigation of Pequot’s trading in Microsoft securities and thus the SEC should reopen it, which it did,” Aguirre said.
“The new legislation closes access to such records, even when the investigation is closed.
“It is hard to imagine how the bill could be more counterproductive,” Aguirre added.
FOX Business Network sued the SEC in March 2009 over its failure to produce documents
related to its failed investigations into alleged investment frauds being perpetrated by Madoff and R. Allen Stanford.
Following the Madoff and Stanford arrests it, was revealed that the SEC conducted investigations into both men prior to their arrests but failed to uncover their alleged frauds.
FOX Business made its initial request to the SEC in February 2009 seeking any information related to
the agency’s response to complaints, tips and inquiries or any potential violations of the securities law or wrongdoing by Stanford.
FOX Business has also filed lawsuits against the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve over their failure to respond to FOIA requests regarding use of the bailout funds and the Fed’s extended loan facilities.
In February, the Federal Court in New York sided with FOX Business and ordered the Treasury to comply with its requests.
Last year, the network won a legal victory to force the release of documents related to New York University’s lawsuit against Madoff feeder Ezra Merkin.
FOX Business’ FOIA requests have so far led the SEC to release several important and damaging documents:
•FOX Business used the FOIA to obtain a 2005 survey that the SEC in Fort Worth was sending to Stanford investors.
The survey showed that the SEC had suspicions about Stanford several years prior to the collapse of his $7 billion empire.
•FOX Business used the FOIA to obtain copies of emails between Federal Reserve lawyers, AIG and staff at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
in which it was revealed the Fed staffers knew that bailing out AIG would result in bonuses being paid.
Recently, TARP Congressional Oversight Panel chair Elizabeth Warren told FOX Business that
the network’s Freedom of Information Act efforts played a “very important part” of the panel’s investigation into AIG.
Warren told the network the government “crossed a line” with the AIG bailout.
“FOX News and the congressional oversight panel has pushed, pushed, pushed, for transparency, give us the documents, let us look at everything.
Your Freedom of Information Act suit, which ultimately produced 250,000 pages of documentation, was a very important part of our report.
We were able to rely on the documents that you pried out for a significant part of our being able to put this report together,” Warren said.