As per an ECLAC report, Argentina was the recipient of the third biggest amount of FDI inflow among the Latin American and the Caribbean nations in 1997. The first and second places in this regard were held by Brazil and Mexico respectively.
Argentina's foreign direct investment flow recorded a substantial increment in the 1990 to 1996 time period. The annual average for this period stood at US$2.8 billion. This was 4 times greater than the comparable figure for the 1980s.
In 1996 the FDI net inflow into Argentina climbed to US$4.2 billion. Compared to 1990 this was a yearly average growth of 15.2%. As per estimates by Argentine authorities, the value of FDI assets between 1990 and 1996 stood at around US$23.6 billion.
Some factors contributed to the rapid increase in FDI inflows into Argentina in the 1990s. They are stated below.
Mercosur membership
Macroeconomic stability
A rapid re-entry into international capital markets facilitated by proper policies on conversion of foreign debt into capital
Special incentive scheme for foreign investment
Incentives for the automotive sector
In 1990, Argentina's FDI inflow accounted for 22% of Latin America's foreign investment inflow. The figure subsequently hovered at around 9.8% to 13.9% in the following 6 to 7 years. Notwithstanding the large absolute value, Argentina's share in Latin America's FDI flow declined in the later half of the 1990s. This may be accounted to certain factors, which are stated below.
Completion of the first round of privatization for Argentinean public companies
A host of transnational companies were interested to operate in Mercosur market but Argentina faced stiff competition from Brazil in luring these investment companies
The advancement of alternative options of external financing in ArgentinaAs per reports from UNCTAD, FDI inflows to the Latin American region and the Caribbean nations increased by 44% in 2004. The figure stood at US$ 68 billion. This increase in FDI flow for the region was registered after a 4 year sequel of decline. These figures were released by UNCTAD in its “World Investment Report 2005: Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D (1)”. The report observed that, the biggest increment in FDI inflows in this region were accounted for by nations with MERCOSUR membership or associate membership.
Argentina leads the pack with a 125% increase. Brazil and Chile followed suit with 79% and 73% increase respectively.
2004 was a watershed year regarding policy changes in the Latin American nations. The policy changes primarily revolved round the participation of private investment in an economy's natural resource sector. This sector normally attracts huge inflows from foreign business firms.
The massive upsurge in commodity prices led some Latin American governments to go in for a modification of their prevalent tax regimes. Some concerned legislations were also changed. The idea behind these government regulations was to secure the lion's share of the rent accruing from the natural resources sector for the state.
These kinds of developments were observed in countries like Argentina, Venezuela, Chile and Peru. These policy measures discouraged FDI inflow to some extent. So the governments of the concerned countries made some other policy changes with an eye to attract foreign investments. They formulated newly devised investment promotion regimes in countries like Argentina and Brazil targeted at attracting investments for industrial activities.
Galloping inflation in 2007 threatened to derail Argentina's road to economic recovery. Rising prices lead to apprehensions of a decline in net profit on goods for export. FDI figures for Argentina were already on the decline from 2006.
Average yearly rate of growth of FDI in Argentina was 11.2% in first quarter of the year 2006. It was lower than the comparable 26% growth it recorded in the time period from 2002 to 2006. From January 2007 to March 2007, it declined by 56.1% and stood at 624 million dollars. This contraction was due to the effect of a 374 million dollars worth of negative reinvested earnings.
Last month, the Bulgarian National Assembly voted to impose an indefinite ban on shale gas exploration and extraction in Bulgaria using hydraulic fracturing or other similar technology. But new evidence have emerged that may suggest some form of covert Russian influence in the matter.
Pity the poor Eastern Europeans.
After fifty years under the domination of their massive Soviet eastern neighbour, the collapse of Communism two decades ago offered undreamed of opportunities to join both the European Union and NATO.
Read more
Professor of Economics & Director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University. Special Adviser to the UN Secretary-General on the Millennium Development Goals. Founder & co-President of the Millennium Promise Alliance.
Chancellor of the Exchequer of the United Kingdom from 1992 to 2007. Prime Minister of the UK between 2007 and 2010. Inaugural 'Distinguished Leader in Residence' at New York University. Advisor at World Economic Forum
CEO and co-CIO of PIMCO. Served as President and CEO of the Harvard Management Company for 2 years, while also working at the IMF for 15 years. In 2008, his book "When Markets Collide", won the Financial Times award for Business Book of The Year in addition to being named as the one of the best business books of all time by The Independent.