27, May 2012, CEST. Welcome to the beta version of Econ Stats, the Economic Statistics Database service provided by EconomyWatch.com.
Country or Region:
Thailand ›
Change country
Economic Indicator: General Government Structural Balance (% Potential GDP)
› See all Thailand indicators,
› See General Government Structural Balance (% Potential GDP) data for all countries
Detailed Analysis for Year: 2010 › Change year
Full Dataset: from 1980 to 2016
Dataset updated: 1st August 2011
Data Source: International Monetary Fund (IMF)
National or Regional Currency: Baht
Currency Symbol: THB
Data are on a national income accounts basis. The structural budget position is defined as the actual budget deficit (or surplus) less the effects of cyclical deviations of output from potential output. Because of the margin of uncertainty that attaches to estimates of cyclical gaps and to tax and expenditure elasticities with respect to national income, indicators of structural budget positions should be interpreted as broad orders of magnitude. See notes for: General government structural balance (National currency).
General Government Structural Balance (% Potential GDP) for Thailand in year 2010 is -2.293 %
This makes Thailand No. 17 in world rankings according to General Government Structural Balance (% Potential GDP) in year 2010. The world's average General Government Structural Balance (% Potential GDP) value is -0.95 %; Thailand is 1.34 less than the average.
In the previous year, 2009, General Government Structural Balance (% Potential GDP) for Thailand was -2.12 % General Government Structural Balance (% Potential GDP) for Thailand in 2010 was or will be 8.16% more than it was or will be in 2009.
In the following or forecasted year, 2011, General Government Structural Balance (% Potential GDP) for Thailand was or will be -2.38 %, which is 3.84% more than the 2010 figure.
| Year | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | -0.974 | ||
| 2015 | -1.06 | ||
| 2014 | -1.212 | ||
| 2013 | -1.352 | ||
| 2012 | -1.699 | ||
| 2011 | -2.381 | ||
| 2010 | -2.293 | ||
| 2009 | -2.12 | ||
| 2008 | -0.764 | ||
| 2007 | -0.047 | ||
| 2006 | 1.849 | ||
| 2005 | 1.41 | ||
| 2004 | 1.867 | ||
| 2003 | 3.225 | ||
| 2002 | -5.211 | ||
| 2001 | -0.748 | ||
| 2000 | -1.012 | ||
| 1999 | n/a | ||
| 1998 | n/a | ||
| 1997 | n/a | ||
| 1996 | n/a | ||
| 1995 | n/a | ||
| 1994 | n/a | ||
| 1993 | n/a | ||
| 1992 | n/a | ||
| 1991 | n/a | ||
| 1990 | n/a | ||
| 1989 | n/a | ||
| 1988 | n/a | ||
| 1987 | n/a | ||
| 1986 | n/a | ||
| 1985 | n/a | ||
| 1984 | n/a | ||
| 1983 | n/a | ||
| 1982 | n/a | ||
| 1981 | n/a | ||
| 1980 | n/a |