26, May 2012, CEST. Welcome to the beta version of Econ Stats, the Economic Statistics Database service provided by EconomyWatch.com.
Region:
Chile ›
Change region
Economic Indicator: Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change)
› See all Chile indicators,
› See Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) data for all countries
Detailed Analysis for Year: 2010 › Change year
Full Dataset: from 1980 to 2016
Dataset updated: 1st August 2011
Data Source: International Monetary Fund (IMF)
National or Regional Currency: Chilean Peso
Currency Symbol: CLP
Source: Central Bank Latest actual data: 2010 Methodology used to derive volumes: Deflation by unit value indexes (from customs data) Formula used to derive volumes: Laspeyres-type Chain-weighted: No Trade System: The Free Zones are included as part of Chile´s economic territory. This means that customs declarations, which are compiled according to the Special Trade System, are adjusted, so that goods are registered as imports when they enter the Free Zones. Re-exports from the Free Zones are recorded as exports. Excluded items in trade: According to BPM5, goods in direct transit are excluded. Excluded items in manufactures: Imports are adjusted to include imports that do not generate customs declarations, such as military and free zone imports. Valuation of exports: Free on board (FOB). C
Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) for Chile in year 2010 is 1.428 %
This makes Chile No. 131 in world rankings according to Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) in year 2010. The world's average Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) value is 9.04 %; Chile is 7.61 less than the average.
In the previous year, 2009, Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) for Chile was -5.73 % Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) for Chile in 2010 was or will be 124.93% less than it was or will be in 2009.
In the following or forecasted year, 2011, Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) for Chile was or will be 4.16 %, which is 191.60% more than the 2010 figure.
| Year | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2.547 | ||
| 2015 | 2.543 | ||
| 2014 | 2.538 | ||
| 2013 | 2.588 | ||
| 2012 | 2.795 | ||
| 2011 | 4.164 | ||
| 2010 | 1.428 | ||
| 2009 | -5.727 | ||
| 2008 | -0.114 | ||
| 2007 | 7.144 | ||
| 2006 | 2.305 | ||
| 2005 | 4.969 | ||
| 2004 | 14.671 | ||
| 2003 | 5.875 | ||
| 2002 | 0.8 | ||
| 2001 | 8.384 | ||
| 2000 | 4.882 | ||
| 1999 | 5.841 | ||
| 1998 | 7.82 | ||
| 1997 | 10.882 | ||
| 1996 | 11.995 | ||
| 1995 | 11.5 | ||
| 1994 | 9.8 | ||
| 1993 | 3.7 | ||
| 1992 | 13.9 | ||
| 1991 | 9.6 | ||
| 1990 | 5.7 | ||
| 1989 | 14.44 | ||
| 1988 | 5.404 | ||
| 1987 | 5.725 | ||
| 1986 | 10.569 | ||
| 1985 | 17.253 | ||
| 1984 | -0.71 | ||
| 1983 | 1.704 | ||
| 1982 | 14.832 | ||
| 1981 | -3.406 | ||
| 1980 | 12.819 |