26, May 2012, CEST. Welcome to the beta version of Econ Stats, the Economic Statistics Database service provided by EconomyWatch.com.
Region:
Central and Eastern Europe ›
Change region
Economic Indicator: External Debt Servicing as % Exports of Goods and Services (External Debt Service as a Percentage of Exports of Goods and Services)
› See all Central and Eastern Europe indicators,
› See External Debt Servicing as % Exports of Goods and Services (External Debt Service as a Percentage of Exports of Goods and Services) data for all countries
Detailed Analysis for Year: 2010 › Change year
Full Dataset: from 1980 to 2016
Dataset updated: 1st August 2011
Data Source: International Monetary Fund (IMF)
National or Regional Currency: US Dollar
Currency Symbol: US$
External Debt Servicing as % Exports of Goods and Services (External Debt Service as a Percentage of Exports of Goods and Services) for Central and Eastern Europe in year 2010 is 59.998
This makes Central and Eastern Europe n/a in world rankings according to External Debt Servicing as % Exports of Goods and Services (External Debt Service as a Percentage of Exports of Goods and Services) in year 2010. The world's average External Debt Servicing as % Exports of Goods and Services (External Debt Service as a Percentage of Exports of Goods and Services) value is 13.65 ; Central and Eastern Europe is 46.35 more than the average.
In the previous year, 2009, External Debt Servicing as % Exports of Goods and Services (External Debt Service as a Percentage of Exports of Goods and Services) for Central and Eastern Europe was 70.38 External Debt Servicing as % Exports of Goods and Services (External Debt Service as a Percentage of Exports of Goods and Services) for Central and Eastern Europe in 2010 was or will be 14.75% less than it was or will be in 2009.
In the following or forecasted year, 2011, External Debt Servicing as % Exports of Goods and Services (External Debt Service as a Percentage of Exports of Goods and Services) for Central and Eastern Europe was or will be 56.85 , which is 5.25% less than the 2010 figure.
| Year | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | n/a | ||
| 2015 | n/a | ||
| 2014 | n/a | ||
| 2013 | n/a | ||
| 2012 | 57.22 | ||
| 2011 | 56.85 | ||
| 2010 | 59.998 | ||
| 2009 | 70.381 | ||
| 2008 | 54.694 | ||
| 2007 | 48.786 | ||
| 2006 | 48.381 | ||
| 2005 | 46.251 | ||
| 2004 | 39.344 | ||
| 2003 | 40.059 | ||
| 2002 | 46.854 | ||
| 2001 | 53.282 | ||
| 2000 | 47.737 | ||
| 1999 | 33.559 | ||
| 1998 | 23.512 | ||
| 1997 | 23.441 | ||
| 1996 | 24.012 | ||
| 1995 | 23.473 | ||
| 1994 | 27.189 | ||
| 1993 | 26.222 | ||
| 1992 | 26.72 | ||
| 1991 | 42.059 | ||
| 1990 | 41.372 | ||
| 1989 | 40.998 | ||
| 1988 | 43.045 | ||
| 1987 | 45.339 | ||
| 1986 | 50.06 | ||
| 1985 | 48.224 | ||
| 1984 | 39.836 | ||
| 1983 | 19.129 | ||
| 1982 | 22.854 | ||
| 1981 | 21.715 | ||
| 1980 | 28.888 |