26, May 2012, CEST. Welcome to the beta version of Econ Stats, the Economic Statistics Database service provided by EconomyWatch.com.
Region:
Belarus ›
Change region
Economic Indicator: Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change)
› See all Belarus indicators,
› See Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) data for all countries
Detailed Analysis for Year: 2010 › Change year
Full Dataset: from 1980 to 2016
Dataset updated: 1st August 2011
Data Source: International Monetary Fund (IMF)
National or Regional Currency: Belarussian Rouble
Currency Symbol: BYR
Source: National Statistical Office. Formally, the National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus Latest actual data: 2009 Base year: Base year is previous year. Methodology used to derive volumes: Cost index divided by Fisher price index. Formula used to derive volumes: Fisher Chain-weighted: No. Last update of weights was 2008. Trade System: General trade Excluded items in trade: In transit;Other;. Excluded items include transit goods and goods from U.N. methodology. Excluded items in manufactures: Excluded items include transit goods and goods from U.N. methodology. Oil coverage: Primary or unrefined products;Secondary or refined products;Other; Valuation of exports: Delivered At Frontier (DAF) Valuation of imports: Cost, insurance, freight (CIF)
Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) for Belarus in year 2010 is 2.5 %
This makes Belarus No. 124 in world rankings according to Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) in year 2010. The world's average Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) value is 9.04 %; Belarus is 6.54 less than the average.
In the previous year, 2009, Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) for Belarus was -11.50 % Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) for Belarus in 2010 was or will be 121.74% less than it was or will be in 2009.
In the following or forecasted year, 2011, Export Volumes of Goods Only (Percent Change) for Belarus was or will be 14.36 %, which is 474.28% more than the 2010 figure.
| Year | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 4.855 | ||
| 2015 | 4.802 | ||
| 2014 | 4.955 | ||
| 2013 | 4.77 | ||
| 2012 | 4.437 | ||
| 2011 | 14.357 | ||
| 2010 | 2.5 | ||
| 2009 | -11.5 | ||
| 2008 | 1.5 | ||
| 2007 | 5.2 | ||
| 2006 | 8.3 | ||
| 2005 | -1.2 | ||
| 2004 | 15.2 | ||
| 2003 | 10.8 | ||
| 2002 | 8.745 | ||
| 2001 | 8.15 | ||
| 2000 | 12.533 | ||
| 1999 | 17.938 | ||
| 1998 | -15.846 | ||
| 1997 | 46.34 | ||
| 1996 | 25.418 | ||
| 1995 | 36.038 | ||
| 1994 | -20.993 | ||
| 1993 | -15.8 | ||
| 1992 | n/a | ||
| 1991 | n/a | ||
| 1990 | n/a | ||
| 1989 | n/a | ||
| 1988 | n/a | ||
| 1987 | n/a | ||
| 1986 | n/a | ||
| 1985 | n/a | ||
| 1984 | n/a | ||
| 1983 | n/a | ||
| 1982 | n/a | ||
| 1981 | n/a | ||
| 1980 | n/a |